Skip to content

Commit ac02bf1

Browse files
committed
add reference to analytic distribution
1 parent fc04d34 commit ac02bf1

File tree

2 files changed

+125
-20
lines changed

2 files changed

+125
-20
lines changed

1_Dataset_prep_and_local_scaling.ipynb

Lines changed: 120 additions & 17 deletions
Large diffs are not rendered by default.

2a_Synthetic_data_example.ipynb

Lines changed: 5 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -33,12 +33,14 @@
3333
" - $r = \\textbf{D}$ (or $\\sigma_E$ in eqs. 28-30).\n",
3434
" - his $\\textbf{s}$ equal to the reciprocal lattice point vector which we calculate below as ```(rs_a, rs_b, rs_c)```.\n",
3535
" - his $\\sigma^2_{\\Delta}$ related to our conditional variance $\\frac{1}{2}(1-r^2)$.\n",
36-
" <br/><br/> \n",
36+
" <br/><br/>\n",
37+
"\n",
38+
"2. It is worth noting the closed-form relationship $r$ and the Pearson correlation has been derived in the signal processing literature, e.g. [(Tang and Kassam 2007)](https://digital-library.theiet.org/doi/abs/10.1049/iet-com%3A20050506), equation 20. \n",
3739
" \n",
38-
"2. The parameter $r$ used here is, in general, a function of resolution. Read's work (p. 903 in Read (1990)) addresses this at length and suggests that a Luzzati model ($r=a\\cdot e^{-b s^2}$) can be a good approximation.\n",
40+
"3. The parameter $r$ used here is, in general, a function of resolution. Read's work (p. 903 in Read (1990)) addresses this at length and suggests that a Luzzati model ($r=a\\cdot e^{-b s^2}$) can be a good approximation.\n",
3941
" <br/><br/>\n",
4042
" \n",
41-
"3. notation:\n",
43+
"4. notation:\n",
4244
" - we will use $hkl$ and ```HKL```\n",
4345
" - we will denote reciprocal lattice point coordinates as ```(rs_a,rs_b,rs_c)``` and $r^*$, with magnitude $1/d_{hkl}$ or ```dHKL```. The scattering vector $s=S_1-S_0$ equals $r^*$ in our case (elastic scattering)."
4446
]

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)