Hi! There is a question that I am puzzled by. Compared with the data obtained when I use normal FBMN analysis in mzmine (an MGF. file and a quant_ file) and the data obtained when I use IIMN to analyze redundant nodes in mzmine (an MGF. file, a quant_ file and edges_msannotation file), the molecular clusters obtained by normal nodes are basically the same as the molecular clusters folded by IIMN. I don't understand what are the advantages of IIMN. What I understand is that in IIMN analysis, is it folded after increasing the number of characteristic ions? If this is the case, can I directly use normal FBMN to analyze it?
https://gnps.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/status.jsp?task=b87712d87982435ea7ccdf8645774aea (normal FBMN analysis jobs)
https://gnps.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/status.jsp?task=3d2f4d3452554eb8b718ee069c15fb6d (IIMN analysis jobs)
Hi! There is a question that I am puzzled by. Compared with the data obtained when I use normal FBMN analysis in mzmine (an MGF. file and a quant_ file) and the data obtained when I use IIMN to analyze redundant nodes in mzmine (an MGF. file, a quant_ file and edges_msannotation file), the molecular clusters obtained by normal nodes are basically the same as the molecular clusters folded by IIMN. I don't understand what are the advantages of IIMN. What I understand is that in IIMN analysis, is it folded after increasing the number of characteristic ions? If this is the case, can I directly use normal FBMN to analyze it?
https://gnps.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/status.jsp?task=b87712d87982435ea7ccdf8645774aea (normal FBMN analysis jobs)
https://gnps.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/status.jsp?task=3d2f4d3452554eb8b718ee069c15fb6d (IIMN analysis jobs)