Connect BioModels/All Curated ModelIds fails: Exception: (307, u'Temporary Redirect')

[yurivict]

The progress indicator goes up to 13% and then throws this exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/lib/moose/gui/biomodelsclient.py", line 240, in runQuery
    name = unicode(self.client.service.getModelNameById(item)).encode("utf-8")
  File "/usr/local/lib/moose/gui/suds/client.py", line 521, in __call__
    return client.invoke(args, kwargs)
  File "/usr/local/lib/moose/gui/suds/client.py", line 581, in invoke
    result = self.send(soapenv)
  File "/usr/local/lib/moose/gui/suds/client.py", line 619, in send
    description=tostr(e), original_soapenv=original_soapenv)
  File "/usr/local/lib/moose/gui/suds/client.py", line 677, in process_reply
    raise Exception((status, description))
Exception: (307, u'Temporary Redirect')

[dilawar]

AFAIK, suds is not being maintained anymore. MOOSE uses suds to download the model. @hrani (and probably @subhacom ) might be able to comment on if there is plan to continue with suds to drop it altogether in favor of 'curl' or urllib2 etc.

[subhacom]

curl or urllib2 is not the same thing as suds, which is a SOAP client. There is a fork of suds which has been maintained irregularly, and if anybody is willing to port the code, zeep might be a better alternative at present.
However I wonder how many users are out there who might want this feature.

[dilawar]

Well, IMO either a feature should be maintained or removed. Let @hrani and @upibhalla take a call on this one. zeep looks promising; it depends only on python-lxml which is a well-maintained library and available on almost all linux flavors for which we build pacakges.

[hrani]

Yes I need to see zeep across the platform, if again not supported across the platform not worth migrating. Will discuss with Upi and take a call.

…

On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 at 9:06 AM, Dilawar Singh ***@***.***> wrote: Well, IMO either a feature should be maintained or removed. Let @hrani <https://github.com/hrani> and @upibhalla <https://github.com/upibhalla> take a call on this one. zeep looks promising; it depends only on python-lxml which is a well-maintained library and available on almost all linux flavors for which we build pacakges. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#230 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALFhw7Fk__kXSP1bejHCDsUmjoVKTN5Sks5tFF5KgaJpZM4RGFsn> .

[dilawar]

@hrani Is it planned for chennapoda?

[hrani]

Will check and let you know.

…

On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 at 4:52 PM, Dilawar Singh ***@***.***> wrote: @hrani <https://github.com/hrani> Is it planned for chennapoda? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#230 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALFhwy7-puBIAddhdz1TGkxQIDc8tTPVks5tbnFjgaJpZM4RGFsn> .

[dilawar]

@hrani Is they any update on this ticket?

[dilawar]

Pinging if there is update here.